I'm not sure if this has been publicised, but the official Odex judgment is now available from the Subordinate Courts website. (For some reason, the LawNet feed seems to have died after 24 July 2007.) I'm sure many, many people would be keen to read the judgment.
It doesn't seem to differ that much from the written grounds that I had posted here earlier. The judge basically fleshed out the reasons for his decision, and there were no new surprises.
As the matter is currently under appeal, I won't comment further.